Breastfeeding Banished from Facebook Again

Isn’t this a lovely moment of motherhood to capture and share with the world? I most certainly think so. I absolutely love seeing beautiful breastfeeding portraits like this and sharing my own. I spend my days and sleepless nights with a baby at the breast, reading about other mothers and their experiences raising their children, some of them tandem nursing just like me and the mother in the photo above. Breastfeeding is one of the most basic parts of raising a human that should be remembered and appreciated, a part that we should all be proud of. But apparently, this snapshot of a mother nurturing her children was too much for Facebook and they have deemed it unacceptable.

What happened?

I shared this photograph, a tandem nursing portrait by Belle Verdiglione Photography, a little earlier this evening on my blog’s Facebook page after I found it on Birth Without Fear’s Facebook page. Later on in the evening when I checked my wall, I found that the photo was deleted from my page and from Birth Without Fear’s page and everyone who had shared it. Why? Because Facebook banned it.

BWF just posted this comment on the deletion, “Oh FB, removing a nursing photo and blocking someone for 24 hours for sharing said nursing photo, kinda violates your own policy. I thought we had come so far….very disappointed.”

What is Facebook’s policy on breastfeeding photos? This is word for word their policy:

Does Facebook allow photos of mothers breastfeeding? Yes. We agree that breastfeeding is natural and beautiful, and we’re very glad to know that it is important for mothers to share their experiences with others on Facebook.found online here

Is deleting another breastfeeding portrait really a big deal? Actually yes, yes it is. Just as the bullies who harass mothers and children who are breastfeeding in public are breaking the law and common decency, Facebook is bullying mothers online by sending the message that these images are obscene. Facebook is in charge of making sure errors like this, deletion of images they say are specifically allowed, don’t keep happening, ensuring that women are not degraded for sharing breastfeeding portraits and prohibited from participating in critical parenting and breastfeeding support systems online. But incidents like this keep on happening. Mothers and support pages, even the New Yorker magazine, are told they are breaking community standards and are kicked off for days, weeks, months, and threatened with permanent deletion over images like this, images Facebook says they support.

When will Facebook fix their broken censoring system? When will the shaming of breastfeeding mothers stop?

 

***UPDATE***

There was an international virtual nurse-in to support breastfeeding mothers who have had their pages banned and photos deleted, like Belle Verdiglione Photography and Birth Without Fear, on Tuesday, January 22nd, 2013. Thousands of mothers and supporters participated. See the Facebook photo nurse-in event page for details. This event was held at just about a year past the big in person nurse-in at Facebook’s Headquarters and around the world in 2012.

Miriam MacMillan was banned from Facebook for 24 hours for sharing a breastfeeding picture on her BREASTFEEDING PAGE, RefreshMe, during this nurse-in. Here is her screen shot.

Do you see anything breaking community standards here? Absolutely not!

Here is RefreshMe’s reply to Facebook after the ban:

Dear Facebook, today we will be testing you on your policy with our new “Facebook Friendly” picture. Your policy says that if a nipple is showing but a child is actively nursing that its OK with facebook- you welcome these beautiful photos. So although we don’t agree with you ( we believe Nipples do not = Rude/Sexy we believe breasts (including nipples) = functional part of a woman’s body- in fact from our entire photo shoot this was the ONLY picture we got where everyone’s nipples were covered or their baby/toddler wasn’t looking around for a split second- but hey they are kids these things happen ALOT!!) We would love it if you would change your policy to include breasts in the context of breastfeeding but for the moment will just be happy if you follow YOUR OWN RULES. Mirrie is still banned but she made this picture for our members to SHARE and show their awesome support.

These mamas are all local and members of this page- we think they are *wonderful* – Don’t you? :)

Sincerely, RefreshMe x

Then, ALL ABOUT AMBER was been banned from Facebook for 3 days, the third time she has been banned for 3-5 days, all for sharing this Spikey Hedgehog Photography portrait.

Again, this image is perfectly acceptable, gorgeous even, and doesn’t break any rules on Facebook. The mother, an editor for Nurture ~ Natural Parenting Magazine, comments, “Do you see the beauty of the picture or do you see the sexualisation of the breast? To me, that photo shows only love. My boy feeding and gently holding my hand. I can’t see why it would upset you – there is less skin showing than a picture of a female in bikini down at the beach …”

And I had my first breastfeeding photo deletion this month too. This photo of a mama nursing her twins (in a position recommended to relieve mastitis) was banned from my page on January 27th, 2013. I can see how this is the most graphic but still, I don’t see any nipples showing.

Share these photos if you support breastfeeding photos on Facebook!

 

Did you participate in the photo nurse-in? Share your photos on my Facebook wall!

 

Related Posts:

Facebook Strikes Down Another Breastfeeding Portrait

Yet again, another breastfeeding photo has been censored from Facebook. According to Breastfeeding, a support page, Facebook removed this photo from their wall.

Take a look.

What do you think is offensive and violates Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities?

Perhaps the delicious looking birthday cake (that made me go out and buy a chocolate cupcake today after I wrote this post) was too treacherous for public consumption? Were they confused about the number of candles on the cake? (Who is the cake for? Is there a 5 year old child off frame?) Were the flames too big and someone thought it was a fire hazard? Or maybe they were they disgusted by the joyous mother who may or may not be breastfeeding her sweet chunky thighed baby? Did someone find the breastfeeding part offensive and flag it for removal and it was removed before being examined? What if that baby is just sucking it’s thumb? Were the boobs on the screen behind the cake too much for Facebook? Shame on TLC for flashing porn! Or, I got it. I know. Is it the unfolded laundry in the rocking chair? OH THE HORROR!! Don’t look!

Here is the thread where this image came from. I’m not sure how long the link will be active though.

Well, I can’t figure it out. Images like these of Pamela Anderson and Tamara Ecclestone in the headlines today show more breast than a breastfeeding mother usually does, and certainly the mother above. And even the cleavage on the screen.

And they are purely for sexual consumption and the male gaze, am I right?

What about breastfeeding images? Who are those for? The mother. The baby when they grow up. The father. Anyone who finds breastfeeding a beautiful, natural act. For educational purposes. For children. They show the love of the mother, the dedication, the pride. Breastfeeding images show the normal, biological function of our mammary glands.

Even if a nursing mother is not covered and is showing some breast tissue, it is perfectly acceptable.

Despite Facebook taking down this image of the Leaky Boob’s a few months back.

If someone can’t handle this image, they should just unlike the page or unsubscribe from a friend who posts things that are not to their taste. Period.

Most states have specifically passed laws to allow breastfeeding in public, regardless of the mother being covered or not, nipple exposed during nursing or not. Why? To protect nursing mothers and babies from rude, uninformed people who think nursing is lewd or sexual. Breastfeeding and seeing breastfeeding online and in public benefits everyone. Facebook agrees. They also say they fully support breastfeeding and images are not to be removed. But it keeps happening.

When I saw this photo on my news feed this morning, it made me happy to see that dimpled hand and the smile on that mama’s face. I am thankful that the majority of breastfeeding images stay on Facebook without removal. But when they are removed, it makes me angry. Because it is sending the wrong message to the people they block. It is shaming them.

Breastfeeding is beautiful. Nurse with pride, mamas!

 

Related

Want to subscribe? Click here. Or follow me on my facebook page, Paa.la

New Yorker Banned From Facebook over Nipple Bulges

Facebook doesn’t discriminate when it comes to their users flashing a little nipple, suspending accounts from breastfeeding mothers to magazines.

The latest to be banned from Facebook? The New Yorker. Yep. Even the magazine giant was banned for sharing a little nip, posting a cartoon that included nipple bulges. GASP!! Did I just say nipple bulges?! Scandalous. 

I read about it today on the Guardian – who posted this painting of the original sinners with a funny caption:

Why ARE female nipples so evil? Seriously. Can someone answer this baffling question for me? What is the world being protected from when our nipples are censored? Nothing. Shaming women benefits no one. It certainly hinders new mothers’ ability to be confident in their new breastfeeding role, lowers societal support, and costs our nation billions in unnecessary healthcare costs and hundred of lives a year.

All I can say is that banning nipples, female nipples over male nipples, makes absolutely no sense to me. Our breasts are what sustain life. Every single human on earth is here today thanks to breast milk. And before anyone gets up in arms about everyone being here because of penises and vaginas, breasts are not sexual, reproductive organs.

What was the offending cartoon that the New Yorker posted? It was this innocuous-looking Mick Stevens cartoon of a naked couple (Adam and Eve) sitting underneath a tree, with the caption “Well, it was original”. I posted it below but might have to remove it if I get any mean warning emails.

stevens-cartoon 1.jpg

Take a look. No private parts exposed. I don’t really consider nipples private parts. So i guess I mean, no genitalia exposed. What about those shocking nipples? Don’t the male and female nipples look pretty similar in the drawing? Well, if you zoom in, this is what they really look like.

Female nipple bulges: Not O.K.:

female-nipples.jpg

Male nipple bulges: O.K.:

male-nipples.jpg

Facebook needs to get over themselves. They allow breastfeeding areola to be exposed while a mother is nursing IF the baby is attached to the breast. They allow breastfeeding statues and naked paintings and other artwork. But cartoons are not artwork? What about all the nipples Heather Cushman-Dowdee draws in her cartoons? Well, I guess she has been suspended too for a tiny little nipple in a comic about accepting nursing mothers in public.

Sigh. One day this silliness will all be over. Right? I have to keep telling myself that because right now, all it does is make me angry and sad about the silly little country we live in that can’t handle a little nipple. Everyone just needs to quit it with the nipplephobia.

What do you think? Have you ever been banned from Facebook?

 

Read more about the incident and what Mick Stevens has to say about it all:

Related

What is acceptable on Facebook: Sexualized Women vs Breastfeeding Mothers

I can’t remember what I was searching for today but instead of finding what I wanted, I found this.

Wowza. Where was this little gem?

ON FACEBOOK.

The very place that kicks breastfeeding mothers off for posting images of their infants nursing from those very same mammary glands. Well, probably not THOSE exact ones. Who knows if that woman’s breasts are usually perky due to good genes, augmentation, or because they could be full of milk. If she would like to latch a baby or two on there, I’d love to see it on Facebook. This one, with the laughable underwire support and no cup? It is a bit too sexual for my taste but I guess they are not breaking any community standards, even though Facebook says they “have a strict “no nudity or pornography” policy. Any content that is inappropriately sexual will be removed.”.

Wait. So that’s not inappropriately sexual? I guess not!

Facebook explains their policy on their website:

Nudity and Pornography

“Facebook has a strict policy against the sharing of pornographic content and imposes limitations on the display of nudity. At the same time, we aspire to respect people’s right to share content of personal importance, whether those are photos of a sculpture like Michelangelo’s David or family photos of a child breastfeeding.”

Why hasn’t the above image been removed? Has no one thought to report it? Heck, I reported it and it is still there.

Sure, they avoided breaking the “no areolas” rule (assuming flashing nipples in any context is considered nudity) in a clever way with those sequened and tassled pasties in the top photo. My brain is having a hard time with all of that. I know that bra and those breasts are supposed to be sexy but three years of nursing two children really has me cracking up. I can’t help but think about those breasts dripping red milk!!

I think the page where I found this photo posted, Majo Rey, is a lingerie store judging by their other photos, which are not all bad, but some of the others they post, like this one below, are inappropriately sexual.

This second image covers more breast but it is clearly sexual. Yet it stays.

What is Facebook’s stance on breastfeeding?

Does Facebook allow photos of mothers breastfeeding?

“Yes. We agree that breastfeeding is natural and beautiful, and we’re very glad to know that it is important for mothers to share their experiences with others on Facebook. The vast majority of these photos are compliant with our policies, and we will not take action on them.

Photos that show a fully exposed breast where the child is not actively engaged in nursing do violate Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. These policies are based on the same standards which apply to television and print media.

It is important to note that photos which we act upon are almost exclusively brought to our attention by other users who complain about them being shared on Facebook.”

Of these two photos, which one do you think was banned? Just a hint. Not the one you would think.

VS

Answer: The Breastfeeding mother was banned from Facebook and her image removed. Not the objectified woman, who was posted *without* the black bars, and without anything on under there. SERIOUSLY!

Photo shared by Samantha Bice

I would much rather have my children see women breastfeeding, mothering their offspring, than women lifting their hips and pushing up their breasts in lingerie or spreading their legs, completely naked in stripper heels. But I suppose these types of overtly sexual images can be seen splashed all over magazines and at the local mall. Ahem, Victoria’s Secret.

It is interesting that Facebook continues to claim they allow breastfeeding photos and art but it is continually taken down, mothers are banned and shamed. Why is suspending mothers and taking down their breastfeeding photos a big deal? Because breastfeeding mothers need support. Cutting them off from sharing the sweet, important, and often tough moments of their lives on Facebook, including photos of their children nursing, sends everyone the wrong message. Sharing images of breastfeeding actually helps normalize breastfeeding in our culture. The more it is seen, the more socially acceptable it will become, raising our national breastfeeding averages and savings billions of dollars and nearly a thousand lives a year. The number of mothers that are kicked out of restaurants, pools, churches, off buses, out of court, or fired from their jobs for breastfeeding is shameful. Breasts are meant to nourish our young. Sure, they can be fun too, but we must all remember…the primary purpose of breasts is for our species survival.

What do you think? Should Facebook quit the BS and own up to their own standards? If they can’t do that, how about just improving the grievance procedure for mothers who just want to get back online without having to wait 30-days?

 

Related

Want to subscribe? Click here. Or follow me on my facebook page, Paa.la

Video: 24 Hours of Facebook Breastfeeding Censorship

Have you seen this yet? It is the final cut of the YouTube video showing the 24 Hours of Facebook Breastfeeding Censorship. Check it out!

via FB! Stop harassing Emma Kwasnica over her breastfeeding pics

Valentine’s Day plans? Post Breastfeeding Photos on Facebook!

I know most people are going to be thinking about flowers or chocolates tomorrow but there is also going to be a virtual nurse-in on Facebook tomorrow. I’ve written about it a few times, (read: Upcoming Nurse-Ins & Why they are a big deal), but I had to say it again. Show your support!

The Valentine’s Day Virtual Facebook Nurse-In is all day tomorrow – February 14th, 2012

Why? This is the virtual version of the nurse-ins that were held worldwide on February 6th, 2012. Read the news on the nurse-ins: Huffington Post (And yes, the main photo there is my photo!)

And if you’re raising your eyebrow, thinking “Why all the fuss? Who really cares? Who really wants to see nursing babies on Facebook anyway?” Read my post about it – Why SEEING breastfeeding is important & Emma Kwasnica’s challenge to you & My Personal Breastfeeding Journey.

Spread the love this Valentine’s Day – show your support and love for breastfeeding and send a message to Facebook that breastfeeding is not obscene! It’s normal and beautiful pictures of breastfeeding should be seen!

Despite a policy change, Facebook is continuing to target and harass women by removing their photos and suspending their accounts. There is a point at which Facebook will no longer be able to ignore the roar of so many voices lifted in unison. Please add your voice!

Many tireless women have put in tremendous effort to raise awareness – lets keep that momentum going and build on it! Share this event with as many people as you can, invite as many as you can, spread the word and spread the love!

Facebook event page: http://www.facebook.com/events/207830855976678/

HOW TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT:
On Valentine’s Day,
1. Change your profile to a breastfeeding photo
2. Optionally upload as many breastfeeding photos as you can!
3. Alternately, please feel free to use the events logo as your profile picture (you can download it here: http://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/420125_2705317469056_1140356891_32096191_409292900_n.jpg).

PAGES TO SUPPORT:
Hey Facebook, breastfeeding is not obscene! (Official petition to Facebook)
Hey FB: Breastfeeding In Public Is FINE – Advertising Formula Is NOT!
If breastfeeding offends you, put a blanket over YOUR head!
FB! Stop harassing Emma Kwasnica over her breastfeeding pics
http://www.facebook.com/Unblock.Danelle.Frisbie
Human Milk 4 Human Babies Global Network
The Leaky Boob

IN THE NEWS:
http://jodinesworld.blogspot.co.nz/2012/01/facebook-harasses-moms-over.html
http://mothering.com/all-things-mothering/breastfeeding/press-release-facebook-continues-its-war-with-canadian-breastfeeding-activists
http://healthland.time.com/2011/05/03/extreme-modesty-facebook-and-breast-feeders-go-at-it-again/
http://www.facebook.com/notes/emma-kwasnica/why-seeing-breastfeeding-is-important-my-personal-challenge-to-you/436431689914

Have you ever had a photo taken down? Take this quick survey!

 

More Profile Photo Options by Jill Smith for tandem and twins nursing mothers:

 

Related Breastfeeding Posts:

Activism – Posters - Photography - Art - Comics Donor Milk - Nursing Incidents

Want to subscribe? Click here. Or follow me on my facebook page, Paa.la

Why SEEING breastfeeding is important & Emma Kwasnica’s challenge to you

I came across this post on Informed Parenting which shared Emma Kwasnica’s thoughts on why seeing breastfeeding is important and why Facebook is wrong and I had to share it. I’ve pasted it below.

My thoughts on why Facebook shouldn’t delete breastfeeding photos? They provide a forum to promote and educate a practice that is critical to our species. According to UNICEF, the “reinforcement of a “breastfeeding culture” and its vigorous defense against incursions of a “formula-feeding culture” is imperative.” The danger of seeing breastfeeding as something to be embarrassed about is that it can cause women to never breastfeed or wean early. Early weaning costs our country billions. $13 billion a year, in fact. Saving money isn’t the only reason why supporting breastfeeding is important. It also saves lives. In the US, if 90 percent mothers fed their babies breast milk only for the first six months of life, the lives of nearly 900 babies would be saved each year. The benefits of breastfeeding are widely touted. Many studies show babies who breastfeed more than 6 months are smarter, better adjusted, have fewer allergies, stronger hearts, stronger lungs, less likely to have asthma, less likely to be obese. For all of those reasons and more, there are real dangers if breast milk is replaced by formula when it isn’t necessary.

Why am I bringing up formula? What do most mothers who wean early give their babies? What do most mothers who never breastfeed give their babies? What do people in public think a nursing mother should be giving their baby? A bottle. A bottle of formula. Yes, many people think it is more acceptable to give a baby a bottle of formula for public expeditions than it is to nurse with a breast. They have no idea the harm formula causes or that a bottle is just an imitation of a breast. I’m not trying to bash mothers who use formula, just people who think a breastfeeding mother should hide her breasts or only nurse at home because bottles should be used for the courtesy of others.

Formula is necessary for many but it is not an equal substitute to breast milk, in any way.

According to UNICEF:

Formula is not an acceptable substitute for breastmilk because formula, at its best, only replaces most of the nutritional components of breast milk: it is just a food, whereas breast milk is a complex living nutritional fluid containing anti-bodies, enzymes, long chain fatty acids and hormones, many of which simply cannot be included in formula.  Furthermore, in the first few months, it is hard for the baby’s gut to absorb anything other than breastmilk. Even one feeding of formula or other foods can cause injuries to the gut, taking weeks for the baby to recover.

Formula should only be used if absolutely necessary. Milk banks or milk sharing should be a more available option than formula, but sadly, that is not the case. But I digress.

Back why seeing nursing mothers in public and on Facebook is a big deal!

Why SEEING breastfeeding is important : My personal challenge to you

by Emma Kwasnica on Sunday, 03 October 2010

I’d just like to talk a bit about the bigger picture here for a moment, in that by Facebook taking this stance against breastfeeding images, and by creating such arbitrary obscenity guidelines as “no exposed areola or nipple may be shown” (I have seen many, many women whose areola covers up to a third or more of their entire breast – a baby’s mouth could never come close to “covering” it all!), it is stigmatizing breastfeeding women, and shaming women into thinking that their breasts are much, much less than the amazing life-giving source they are. Nipplephobia has reached epic proportions here in North America, and this is to the supreme detriment of babies everywhere.

Just think for one moment, how many more women would breastfeed, or for how much longer, if only we rid society of the harmful practice of over-sexualizing women’s breasts! And how much this, in turn, could benefit BABIES. For whose voice do the most vulnerable members of society have, if not ours? Interestingly, we find cultures around the world where women’s breasts are seen *only* in their functioning capacity, i.e., that of nourishing and comforting their young. I believe that we can get there, too (or at least try to find some balance), but we have to start somewhere, and I truly feel that there is never any harm to come from challenging the status quo (you’re not surprised, I know ;-) ).

I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again : as a childbirth professional, but also as a woman, in general, it is absolutely crucial that one support ALL women to breastfeed their young. While you, personally, may have your own code of “decency” for how much skin YOU are comfortable showing while breastfeeding, it is important that you do not impose your own, completely arbitrary line drawn in the sand regarding “modesty” or “discreetness”, onto any other breastfeeding mother. Period. Just like a woman who wants to cover up should be supported (and generally IS in our society….), we need to support those women who struggle –or those women who do not want, or care– to cover their baby and their breast, and make life simpler for these women to, first and foremost, feed and comfort the baby!

Quite simply, this is about normalizing breastfeeding. The more we hide it away, classify it as obscene, shame mothers into covering up while feeding, and encourage women to retire to “private” rooms in order to breastfeed the baby, the less we see of it in public, and the less and less people are comfortable with the very idea of nursing in public. This is the sad reality, in this pathologically hyper-sexualized (yet sexually repressed…) North American culture of ours. The solution, however, seems quite simple to me; breastfeeding (and/or images of breastfeeding) need to be seen every day, and I am convinced that SEEING more breastfeeding, wherever possible, is what will change our breastfeeding culture. Re-normalize it. Everywhere in North America (in all provinces in Canada, and in every state in the USA but two) women have the right to breastfeed in public, wherever they have the legal right to be. So women should do it. And they should feel completely free to do it. Lots of it. As much as possible.

If you want to be a part of the solution, here is one, simple thing you can do, each and every time you see a mother breastfeeding her baby in public : yes, give her a great, big smile, but don’t stop there –go right *up* to her, and tell her what a wonderful thing she is doing for her child. I guarantee you, that if we all did even this simple gesture every time we saw a woman nursing in public, the tides would begin to turn.

I would also like to suggest in your daily life (outside the ‘net), that you get out there and nurse your children in public. And do so with a huge smile across your face. Pretty hard for onlookers to say, feel, or do something negative in the face of a beaming, breastfeeding mother –n’est-ce pas?

Breastfeeding is normal. Normal. NORMAL. Say it, do it, show it.

Will you start by doing these simple acts right today? Indeed, I challenge you.

Warm regards,
~Emma Kwasnica

BREAKING A TABOO. Emma Kwasnica & her family at the 2008 Montréal Breastfeeding Challenge. This photo and article were published in Le Journal de Montréal, a major daily francophone newspaper. This image was banned from Facebook.

If a North American city of 2.5 million can handle this in their daily paper, why can’t Facebook?

My Related Posts:

Want to subscribe? Click here. Or follow me on my facebook page, Paa.la

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...